Breach of Confidence: Improper Use of Business Information Including Trade Secrets | Lynxs Paralegal
Helpful?
Yes No Share to Facebook

Breach of Confidence:

Improper Use of Business Information Including Trade Secrets



Last Updated: June 12 2026

Question: What should I do if a former employee or contractor in Ontario misuses my confidential business information or trade secrets?

Answer: If someone you shared confidential information with later uses it without permission, you may have a breach of confidence claim, which generally requires showing the information was confidential, shared in confidence, and misused, as outlined by the Supreme Court of Canada in Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574; Lynxs Paralegal provides Legal Services across Ontario to help you document confidentiality, preserve evidence, send a demand letter, and pursue remedies like injunctions and damages.   For fast, practical guidance to protect your business’s recipes, software, client lists, or processes, call (647) 249-6676 to book a confidential intake.

Misused Business Secrets

The success of a business may rely heavily upon secret recipes, proprietary software, unique systems, and customized processes; and accordingly, information relating to these key aspects may be highly valued with misuse of such confidential information quite harmful. In tort law, breach of confidence involves the wrongful use of information that was openly shared with the party that subsequently misuses the secretive information; and in this respect, breach of confidence differs from theft of trade secrets which would involve an element of misappropriation.

The Law

As per the case of Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574, a Supreme Court decision, the elements that must be proven within a breach of confidence case are:

  • The information conveyed was confidential;
  • The information was communicated in confidence; and
  • The information was misused by the party to whom it was communicated.

Specifically, per Lac Minerals Ltd., the Supreme Court said:


I can deal quite briefly with the breach of confidence issue.  I have already indicated that Lac breached a duty of confidence owed to Corona.  The test for whether there has been a breach of confidence is not seriously disputed by the parties.  It consists in establishing three elements:  that the information conveyed was confidential, that it was communicated in confidence, and that it was misused by the party to whom it was communicated.  In Coco v. A. N. Clark (Engineers) Ltd., [1969] R.P.C. 41 (Ch.), Megarry J.  (as he then was) put it as follows at p. 47:

In my judgment, three elements are normally required if, apart from contract, a case of breach of confidence is to succeed.  First, the information itself, in the words of Lord Greene, M.R. in the Saltman case on page 215, must "have the necessary quality of confidence about it."  Secondly, that information must have been imparted in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence.  Thirdly, there must be an unauthorized use of that information to the detriment of the party communicating it . .  .

As a particularly interesting example case, Cadbury Schweppes Inc. v. FBI Foods Ltd., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 142 involved the licensing of the recipe for Clamato juice by Duffy-Mott (a company later acquired by Cadbury Schweppes Inc.) to Caesar Canning who then contracted production to FBI Foods Ltd.  After Cadbury Schweppes acquired Duffy-Mott, Caesar Canning was notified of termination of the licensing agreement; however, FBI, who later acquired assets of Caesar Canning, made use of the recipe despite a lack of authorization to do so.

Conclusion

Improper use of secretive information may constitute as the tort of breach of confidence where information was confidential, information was communicated within a confidential context, and the information was then misused by the party that received the communication.

At
Our Desk Now!
Need Help? Let's Get Started Today

NOTE: Do not send confidential information through the web form.  Use the web form only for your introduction.   Learn Why?
6

NOTE: A considerable amount of online searches for terms like “lawyers in my vicinity” or “top lawyer in” often indicate a pressing need for effective legal assistance rather than a particular title of a legal professional.  In Ontario, licensed paralegals operate under the same Law Society that regulates lawyers and are empowered to represent clients in specified litigation matters.  Skills in advocacy, legal analysis, and procedural expertise are crucial to their function.  Lynxs Paralegal provides legal representation within its licensed framework, focusing on strategic positioning, preparation of evidence, and persuasive advocacy geared towards attaining efficient and advantageous resolutions for clients.

AR, BN, CA+|EN, DT, ES, FA, FR, GU, HE, HI
IT, KO, PA, PT, RU, TA, TL, UK, UR, VI, ZH
Send a Message to: Lynxs Paralegal

NOTE: Do not send confidential details about your case.  Using this website does not establish a legal-representative/client relationship.  Use the website for your introduction with Lynxs Paralegal. 
Privacy Policy & Cookies | Terms of Use Your IP Address is: 216.73.217.50
Lynxs Paralegal



431 Davis Drive

Newmarket, Ontario,
L3Y 2P1   [Map]

P: (647) 249-6676
E: info@lynxslegal.com

Hours of Business:

10:00AM – 5:00PM
10:00AM – 5:00PM
10:00AM – 5:00PM
10:00AM – 5:00PM
10:00AM – 5:00PM
Monday:
Tuesday:
Wednesday:
Thursday:
Friday:

By appointment only.  Call for details.
Messages may be left anytime.


Newmarket
Toronto
Niagara Falls
Markham
and Surrounding Areas.

Assistive Controls:  |   |  A A A