Breach of Confidence: Improper Use of Business Information Including Trade Secrets | Lynxs Paralegal
Helpful?
Yes No Share to Facebook

Breach of Confidence:

Improper Use of Business Information Including Trade Secrets



Last Updated: August 24 2026

Question: How can I prove breach of confidence if someone misused my confidential business recipe or process in Ontario?

Answer: Lynxs Paralegal can help you assess whether your facts fit the tort of breach of confidence, which generally requires showing that the information had the necessary quality of confidence, was communicated in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence, and was then misused to your detriment, per Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574.   If you have licensing, NDA, or email trail evidence showing the disclosure was confidential and that the recipient used it without authorization, Ontario counsel can also help you identify remedies and next steps before the misuse expands, call (647) 249-6676 for legal services guidance.

Add this website to Google Preferred Sources


Misused Business Secrets

In business, the product recipes, proprietary software, systems and processes, among many other things, may be highly valuable and the misuse of such confidential information may result in considerable harm.  Generally, breach of confidence involves the wrongful use of information that was openly shared with the party that subsequently misuses the secretive information; and in this respect, breach of confidence differs from theft of trade secrets which would involve an element of misappropriation.

The Law

Per the Supreme Court in the case of Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574, the elements requiring proof so to constitute a breach of confidence case are:

  • The information conveyed was confidential;
  • The information was communicated in confidence; and
  • The information was misused by the party to whom it was communicated.

Specifically, per Lac Minerals Ltd., the Supreme Court said:


I can deal quite briefly with the breach of confidence issue.  I have already indicated that Lac breached a duty of confidence owed to Corona.  The test for whether there has been a breach of confidence is not seriously disputed by the parties.  It consists in establishing three elements:  that the information conveyed was confidential, that it was communicated in confidence, and that it was misused by the party to whom it was communicated.  In Coco v. A. N. Clark (Engineers) Ltd., [1969] R.P.C. 41 (Ch.), Megarry J.  (as he then was) put it as follows at p. 47:

In my judgment, three elements are normally required if, apart from contract, a case of breach of confidence is to succeed.  First, the information itself, in the words of Lord Greene, M.R. in the Saltman case on page 215, must "have the necessary quality of confidence about it."  Secondly, that information must have been imparted in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence.  Thirdly, there must be an unauthorized use of that information to the detriment of the party communicating it . .  .

As a particularly interesting example case, Cadbury Schweppes Inc. v. FBI Foods Ltd., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 142 involved the licensing of the recipe for Clamato juice by Duffy-Mott (a company later acquired by Cadbury Schweppes Inc.) to Caesar Canning who then contracted production to FBI Foods Ltd.  After Cadbury Schweppes acquired Duffy-Mott, Caesar Canning was notified of termination of the licensing agreement; however, FBI, who later acquired assets of Caesar Canning, made use of the recipe despite a lack of authorization to do so.

Conclusion

Improper use of secretive information may constitute as the tort of breach of confidence where information was confidential, information was communicated within a confidential context, and the information was then misused by the party that received the communication.

At
Our Desk Now!
Need Help? Let's Get Started Today

NOTE: Do not send confidential information through the web form.  Use the web form only for your introduction.   Learn Why?
5

NOTE: A considerable amount of online searches for terms like “lawyers in my vicinity” or “top lawyer in” often indicate a pressing need for effective legal assistance rather than a particular title of a legal professional.  In Ontario, licensed paralegals operate under the same Law Society that regulates lawyers and are empowered to represent clients in specified litigation matters.  Skills in advocacy, legal analysis, and procedural expertise are crucial to their function.  Lynxs Paralegal provides legal representation within its licensed framework, focusing on strategic positioning, preparation of evidence, and persuasive advocacy geared towards attaining efficient and advantageous resolutions for clients.

AR, BN, CA+|EN, DT, ES, FA, FR, GU, HE, HI
IT, KO, PA, PT, RU, TA, TL, UK, UR, VI, ZH
Send a Message to: Lynxs Paralegal

NOTE: Do not send confidential details about your case.  Using this website does not establish a legal-representative/client relationship.  Use the website for your introduction with Lynxs Paralegal. 
Privacy Policy & Cookies | Terms of Use Your IP Address is: 18.97.14.81
Lynxs Paralegal



431 Davis Drive

Newmarket, Ontario,
L3Y 2P1   [Map]

P: (647) 249-6676
E: info@lynxslegal.com

Hours of Business:

10:00AM – 5:00PM
10:00AM – 5:00PM
10:00AM – 5:00PM
10:00AM – 5:00PM
10:00AM – 5:00PM
Monday:
Tuesday:
Wednesday:
Thursday:
Friday:

By appointment only.  Call for details.
Messages may be left anytime.


Etobicoke
Niagara Falls
York Region
Aurora
and Surrounding Areas.

Assistive Controls:  |   |  A A A